Course description
Pharmaceutical Regulatory Affairs in China
Develop or market your drug in China more effectively with a deep understanding of the Chinese pharmaceutical regulatory landscape. In 2015 China’s pharmaceutical sector underwent significant regulatory reforms to align with EMA & FDA requirements, making the Chinese market one of the biggest pharmaceutical markets in the world. The reforms included clinical trial approval time being cut from 2 years to 60 days and the NMPA becoming a member of ICH.
During this course, you will learn fundamental Chinese regulatory requirements for pharmaceuticals and how they relate to the country’s economic and cultural background. Guided by our expert course leader you will discover best practices for registering new drugs and discuss the likely impact of the US – China Trade War on market access and drug development.
Do you work at this organisation and want to update this page?
Is there out-of-date information about your organisation or courses published here? Fill out this form to get in touch with us.
Suitability - Who should attend?
This course is applicable to anyone interested in accessing the Chinese pharmaceutical marketplace.
- Relevant job titles may include:
- Heads of Department
- Directors
- Managers
- Consultants
- Relevant departments may include:
- Project Management
- Regulatory Affairs
Training Course Content
- Understand how China’s cultural and economic background has impacted pharmaceutical regulations
- Learn about reforms to legislation in China and the reasons behind the changes, including the development of the NMPA and the move to the 60-day clinical trial approval time
- Learn best practices for successfully registering pharmaceutical products in China and the challenges which coincide with it
- Familiarise yourself with the regulations governing biopharmaceuticals in China, evaluate the trends and gain an overview of CMC guidance
- Understand the potential impact of the US-China Trade War on the Chinese pharmaceutical market
Why choose PTI
On average, delegates of their online academies said:
Quality of content:
4/5
85% had applied content during the course to their role
Delivery rating:
4/5