Course description
Shared ownership of intellectual property rights (‘IPR’) can be a complex area for many reasons.
This webinar will look at IPR (specifically, patents, copyright, designs, and trade marks) as legal assets that can be jointly owned/held by multiple parties or co-owners, the default rules that apply to such co-ownership arrangements in the absence of expressly agreed terms, and the advantages and disadvantages of those default rules versus express agreements.
The webinar is presented by Emma Kennaugh-Gallacher, Senior Professional Support Lawyer at Mewburn Ellis LLP. Emma has experience in IP law and transactions, as well as IP dispute resolution and litigation. Be sure to tune in to benefit from her knowledge of this topic.
Upcoming start dates
Outcome / Qualification etc.
Training Course Content
Introduction
This webinar will look at intellectual property rights (‘IPR’) (specifically, patents, copyright, designs and trade marks) as legal assets that can be jointly owned/held by multiple parties or co-owners, the default rules that apply to such co-ownership arrangements in the absence of expressly agreed terms, and the advantages and disadvantages of those default rules versus express agreements.
Shared ownership of IPR can be a complex area for many reasons; the intangible nature of the property, the difficulties in quantifying the contributions made to a patentable invention or a copyright work by multiple inventors or authors, and of course conflicting opinions amongst the co-owners regarding the best way to commercialise and/or otherwise exploit the IPR post-creation.
What You Will Learn
This short webinar will cover the following:
- How do co-ownership scenarios happen/arise for patents, copyright, designs and trade marks?
- How does co-ownership work for patents?
- What are the implied/statutory provisions on co-ownership of patents, copyright, designs and trade marks?
- Express contractual terms
- Advantages and disadvantages of relying on implied provisions for patents, copyright, designs and trade marks
- The implications for unitary patents and the Unified Patent Court
- General advantages and disadvantages of relying on implied provisions for IPR:
- Automatic entitlement and protection
- Statutory provisions mostly inadequate for commercial arrangements
- Advantages of using an express co-ownership agreement:
- Allows the parties to set out their preferred approach - may even be more appropriate for one party to take assignment of the IPR and then licence back to the now ex-co-owner
- Exploitation of the IPR - licensing, in-house manufacture and sale of protected products etc
- Prosecution and registration of the IPR where appropriate - i.e. patent application process, renewals, opposition proceedings
- Approach to defence and enforcement - i.e. third-party challenges to validity and third-party infringements
- Future development - i.e. further research using the protected invention in the case of patents
Expenses
MBL Seminars Limited
With over 1,000 expert speakers covering more than 3,360 different topics, our course portfolio is vast and can be delivered either online or in-person. With over 450 years of collective professional development experience, we are proud to be trusted to...